I loved Disney movies growing up, they seemed so safe and
family friendly. The good guys always won and the bad guys were always
punished. There was the just the right
amount of singing and not too much mushy stuff for a young boy to suffer
through. Being a bit older though the
subtext and the message of the animated films often horrify me. A lot of movies have an unsettling thread
running through the story unintentionally
so I could be overstating.
So what are some of these not so nice themes that seem to
pop up in Disney you ask? You don’t have
to say it out loud just thinking in your own head will suffice.
How about racism?
Yeah, I played the race card, deal with it. Disney created a movie so racist they refuse
to even dignify its existence. The song “Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah”
lives on but The Song of South most certainly does not. If you’re ask yourself what the hell is Song
of the South that isn’t abnormal. It’s
the live action film with three Br’er Rabbit shorts placed inside that Disney
refuses to rerelease. You can see Br’er
Rabbit on Splash Mountain and few other places but his movie isn’t seeing the light
of day. They don’t use the term Disney
vault lightly. That shit it never coming
back out.
Well, they obviously learned a lesson after that fiasco. Disney would never again impugn African
American culture by abusing stereotypes right?
Unless of course you count the crows from Dumbo, the African American satyrs
from Fantasia (which have been excised from the original cut so good
luck finding them), King Louie from the Jungle Book and most recently
Sebastian from The Little Mermaid.
Sebastian at least wasn’t the kind of racism that make you squirm in
your seat. It’s just the kind of racism
that you can explain away to friends by saying, “Oh yeah, Uncle John is alright
as long as you don’t talk about Asians. But he’s really a nice guy, I swear.”
Any other stereotypes Disney perpetrated on our young, eager
to assimilate any message, minds? I’m
glad you asked. Remember the native
American’s in Peter Pan. Watch
that shit. I’m not even going to explain
why it’s fucked up. You don’t need me for
that. Or hey, how about the twin cats Si
and Am from Lady and the Tramp (voiced by Peggy Lee who I’m pretty sure
was not Asian, just a hunch)? I wonder
if they might be racist caricatures?
Yes, the answer is yes, put your good damn hands down.
Tying along with racism is well racism again but kinda of
different. Before we thought about stereotypes
now I’m talking about color palettes.
Totally different right? Your
silence is good enough for me,
What am I talking about with color palettes? Quick what did Hercules look like? If you said blond with blue eyes and a fair
complexion congratulations you relate closer to Disney than Kevin Sorbo. Sorry Kev… well, not really. Now think about the are the movie is set
in. The answer is Greece. You can stop thinking. I should probably give a space or something to
let you have time before you eager eye can gobble up the information but fuck
the extra work to do that. Suck that
Enter button.
So Hercules is pale as all hell when he shouldn’t be and
Hades is dark grey. There are quite a few
other problems with this movie but I’ll get into that later. Yeah light person is good and dark person is
bad thanks for making things easy for me.
Or instead of color palette just switch in the term ethnic
looking. Fast forward any Disney movie
to a random spot. I’ll wait.
Ok, now look at the person on the screen. Are they female? Skip ahead. Yes, there is a reason for this, and no, I will not tell you why yet. Okay is the dude super ‘ethnicy’ or something?
Yes?
Congratulations, you found the villain.
It so true that if you argue I will reach through the
internet and slap your stupid face Kyle.
What about Aladdin? The
two main characters don’t look at all like white people who just happen to be living
in Arabia. And Jafar isn’t super Arabian
looking at all or anything. In Princess
and the Frog, Disney’s latest traditional animated movie, the bad guy may
have been just a wee bit darker than the African American leads. Just a touch.
Or a shit ton one or the other.
Oh, and the country bumpkin lightning bug thing was super classy. Like Transformers 2 classy. Burn.
So there was a few not so great moments in relation to ethnicity
that may or may not be getting any better.
But at least we are treating women like things right? Right…
Yeah, so Disney totally thinks women are things. These supposed love stories are not
affirming. Yeah, that whole thing with a
Prince kissing a cold, cadaver-like lady is not at all creepy. You know what happens in real life for
kissing a sleeping women? Bad things
involving the police and losing the privilege to vote afterwards.
Outside of somnophilia there is still plenty of not so good
sex and gender issues. Like the message
of young girls changing everything about themselves to please a guy they hardly
know. That’s healthy and couldn’t possibly
have any repercussion on the psyche of young girls. Maybe if I explain the situation it won’t
seem so fucked up. Alright, so you’re a
pretty girl and you validate yourself through your looks and you beautiful
singing voice (one of those things is better than the other, you figure it out). You see some dude and decide hey, he’s awesome
I wish I could ditch my worry free lifestyle ot be with this stranger. He’ll totally love me even though I know
nothing about him. Swoon. Hey this whole changing myself to be near him
was a great idea. It’s too bad I can’t FUCKING
TALK. That’s okay. I’ll give up one of only two things I care
about to be with this guy I don’t know at all.
And risk everything in the process.
Good idea right? Swoon! Fuck this is bad something went terribly
wrong with this whole deceit thing.
Deceit is the best way to get someone to love me right?
That is part of the plot of The Little Mermaid. Ariel, a teenager, gives up her voice to be a
human. Yeah, I know there are other
factors involved like being an idiot teenager and getting away from Dad but to
change everything about yourself for guy you fantasized about without
meeting? Fantasies are just that. Of course it’s Disney so everything turns out
just fine but that further ratifies the shitty message. Don’t change yourself for others change yourself
for you. And for the love of god don’t
negotiate with half squid half women.
Also shut up and listen to your father you’re like what fourteen? That’s way too young to be obsessing about a
life with some guy. Kissing sure but…
teenagers… stupid decisions… sigh.
So to round it out let’s throw in some Stockholm syndrome. Goody.
So this Beast guy kidnaps you.
Then he imprisons you and yells a lot.
But he has this gentle side right?
No you fucking moron he kidnapped you and forced you to stay with him. So what if Gaston can eat a shit ton of eggs
he shouldn’t be the bad guy. But Disney
still swaps out the interesting part.
The fun thing about Beauty and the Beast is that Beast isn’t supposed to
change. You should love him besides his
looks. Him changing back invalidates
that message. So an important message if
you get kidnapped and the dishes start signing jump out the fucking window,
shit will not end well for you. Belle is
the exception.
So women do stupid stuff for love. This isn’t unusual we all do stupid things
for love especially if we’re young. But
at least when a woman proves herself to be equal to man or even better she can
take over the role he filled right? Not
in the Lion King. What am I tlkaing
about? How about the fact that Nala kicks
Simba’s ass not once but twice. And does
so with the same exact move both time separated by several years. Way to learn from your defeat Simba. Why is this important. Well if Simba was physically weaker than Nala
why didn’t she kick Scar’s ass. Why did
they need Simba to help. You can argue
well they need a male for breeding purposes.
Well maybe not Scar so much for the job.
He was kinda typified as gay. In
Hamlet, the story Lion King follows (along with stealing from some Anime or
other), the uncle kills the father and Hamlet is visited by the ghost of his father
and he takes revenge blah, blah, blah… Mufasa, Mufasa, Mufasa.
So the straight male lion needs to grab power from the gays and
the minorities because the woman are too weak and stupid to do it on their
own. Yeah, the hyena’s just might be
typified as minorities. Super nice that
the grand kingdom worked awesome as long as the straight male ran things. Then went to shit when Jeremy Irons and
Whoopi Goldberg moved in. Not the first
time Whoopi Goldberg has ruined everything… cough Jumping Jack flash… cough … Eddie…
Cough sputter choke… Theodore Rex. Sorry
about that.
There are some funky exceptions like you know James Earl
Jones being all African American or Timon and Pumba being best buddies and
rasing a son of their own. I totally respect
their lifestyle choices by the way, parenting skills maybe not so much. Maybe a little less show tunes and little
more maybe you should worry about one or two things now please don’t eat us.
Disney at times is racially and gender insensitive but at
least they respect the material they remake and try to keep it historically
accurate.
Everything about Mulan pisses me off. The Chinese emperor would never touch
anybody. Also you don’t enter the palace
with your stuff intact. Also there’s the
whole deal with the Japanese geisha makeup on a women on Chinese descent in a
movie about… China. Or the whole chronology
being all screwy depending on what the story demanded. “Huns sure, fireworks sure, great wall, yeah
throw that shit in there. What period is
set in? The period of shut your mouth
and give me your money.” – some fictional guy at Disney voiced by my head. I just Googled “Mulan inaccuracies” and came
up with several useful sites.
Convenient links:
Or then again there is Pocahontas. Albeit the historical inaccuracy totally turns
down the creep factor from Ariel’s misadventure by Having Pocahontas not be a
teenager. This may be the only time a article
about racism which involve Mel Gibson
without saying he’s an asshole and why.
Yeah, creep factor just went back up to eleven.
There is also Hercules again. Everything is wrong here. Nothing about the myths were shown correctly. I’m strangely okay with Paul Schaffer as
Hermes for some reason though. In the Greco
Roman myths Hercules was a dick. He
committed the worst kinds of crimes possible and was punished with the twelve
trials. Also Hades wasn’t a bad
guy. He was just lonely. Most of the other gods were far worse. Hades was just a dude that lost a game of
dice with two brother Zeus and Poseiden and got stuck with the shit job. How did Hades deal with shitty lot. He ran the fuck out of the afterlife and mostly
stayed out of mortal affairs. He didn’t
do any swan rape stuff that resulted in horrible tragedies and a decade of war
like a certain thunder god. Rip Torn screen
tested that voice over. It totally
worked.
So now we have racism (twice!), historical inaccuracy,
horrid love stories that teach the wrong lesson, and stomping all over the idea
of anything that isn’t the traditionally nuclear family with the male firmly as
head of household. You might ask, “Hey,
what about The Sword in the Stone”. Then I would say thanks helpful segue
creation.
It is correct that Sword in Stone didn’t really have those issue
but it it did have a hero who’s only real accomplishment was being ‘the chosen one’. That is not so fantastic. It’s what I like to call “The useless
protagonist”. Harsh.
A lot of children’s stories have the problem of the
protagonist just kind of being there.
The only skill they display is being special. That’s not say as important as bravery of
intelligence or a myriad of ways traditional heroes prove themselves. But kids movies have a protagonists that the
audience demographic csan relate to.
Themselves. They want to be
special (who doesn’t) but they lack to ability to be awesome somehow so the
protagonists’ only skill is one any youngling can have. Being special. Two examples are The Sword in the Stone and Snow
White. The issue here with the main
character not really doing anything and relegating all the action or conflict
resolution to other characters is there is no arc. A good story should have this character arc. Character should meaningful growth. When there is no growth or the character does
not overcome a flaw often times the story ends, intentionally, with
tragedy. This is a common device in noir
films where the lead is normally damaged good to begin with and can’t overcome
the tragic flaw. Most often this flaw
surfaces with drinking.
But these characters still end up with a happy ending after
no character progression. We as an
audience feel cheated somewhat as the protagonist is almost as much of viewer
as we are. Who are we to relate to in
order to feel satisfaction at the resolution?
But there are always exceptions. There is one that is so good I’m almost
surprised Disney made it. I call it The Lilo
and Stitch exception. I really liked
Lilo and Stitch. On the surface
it’s a movie about a girl, an alien and their misadventures. The movie is really about being a in a broken
family that is trying desperately to stay strong. Lilo ends up teaching a genetic experiment
about the importance of ‘ohana’ then ends up realizing herself how important
her family is and how her actions haven’t been helping. Oddly reminiscent of a character arc. They treated Lilo like a real little girl: full
of insecurities, idiosyncrasies (like feeding her favorite fish a sandwich) and
correct childish mentality that at first inhibits her character growth. Both Lilo and Stitch have the same growth
over the film. They made Lilo’s sister
struggle but not be a martyr or a salve driving harpy. It all too often happens that the older
female is either treated only as the dotting matriarch or the evil
stepmother. Here we have normal
characters going through normal relatable troubles we can see ourselves
in. Just in this case with some aliens
thrown in as well to keep it fun. Plus that
dude from “Kids in the Hall”.
Here’s to hoping they make more Lilo and less Ariel. But please, no more direct to video crap,
okay?
Ben
I'm going to address a couple of the different comments you made (which by the way, I agreed with 95% of them!) and add a few of my own. Loved this post.
ReplyDelete1. It might just be that I'm naive but can you please better explain Sebastian as a racist figure?
2. Did you miss the what I always considered to be pedophiliac snake in the Jungle Book? I didn't know why, but I was always creeped out by that snake (Throw in the fact that it was voiced by Winnie the Pooh and you've just ruined my whole childhood.)
3. The only females in Peter Pan besides Wendy are either the vicious and harpy-esque mermaids and the mindless slave Native American women.
4. Ever notice that the sultan in Aladdin looks like Santa Clause? So even when he's telling his daughter "Yeah, I'm basically forcing you into slavery." you still aren't supposed to hate him.
5. If I remember the original Beauty and the Beast correctly, the Beast gives the father the option of either himself or one of his daughters return to the castle of their own free will. Belle does it to save her father.
6. Nathan Lane played Timon. Did you expect anything else?
7. I completely agree about the whole Greek mythology thing. It was infuriating to me. Especially when the whole reason for Hades' anger was that he was stuck in the Underworld by Zeus, which is just NOT true.
8. Don't even get me started on the gifts given by the fairy godmothers in Sleeping Beauty.
9. Pixar seems to be helping Disney for the better in terms of underlying messages. For example:
- Incredibles deals with a man going through a bit of a midlife crisis because he doesn't feel validated anymore and in the end he realizes that his family makes him stronger, not weaker. (although the fact that his wife doesn't just talk to him about her concerns does piss me off).
- Monsters, Inc. deals with an economic recession and how two hetero-lifemates work together to problem solve while not compromising their ethics of acquiring enegery.
- Finding Nemo has a single parent who is insecure about his abilities as both a father and a mother and has to learn to let go of the fact that his son is growing up while a child has to learn that he is capable in spite of having a disability.
- Did you even SEE Tangled or Brave?
In my critique I’m really specifically targeting classic Disney animated films not their CG films or Pixar’s. Pixar while under the Disney umbrella doesn’t operate the same way or follow the same conventions thematically. I think Pixar is one of the best and most consistent studios right now. They make great stories with well rounded characters and they aren’t afraid to take chances. Wall-E is a great example of unconventional story telling that worked fantastically. As far of their storytelling and worth I think the best example would be UP. the opening sequence is perhaps one of my favorite sequences in cinema. It was emotionally powerful in a way only real art can be.
DeleteI have seen Tangled but I have yet to see Brave. While I enjoyed Tangled I don’t think it was anything of great worth. The problem with Disney is that they tend to make great movies that are memorable. If they made garbage it wouldn’t be as bad if they had some shady messaging lurking beneath.
But I think one of the reason why the protagonists oftentimes appear whitewashed while the antagonists are portrayed as ‘other’ is for ease of the audience adopting the character as their portal into the world. If the main character, who we tend to experience the world through, is not relatable it isn’t as easy to jump into the world of the film. So you can hedge your bet by making the character look like someone you might see in your hometown.
Sebastian is a slight exaggeration of Jamaican stereotype. Not as obvious and exaggeration as earlier cartoons; and remember we are judging films starting from the 30’s out of their era of creation to today’s standards.
Cracked wrote an article about the most racist characters perpetrated by Disney:
http://www.cracked.com/article_15677_the-9-most-racist-disney-characters.html
Thanks for your response.
Ben
I think crying racism goes a bit to far when you take in the account the dates some of these movies where published, and what tools they had that they could use help expand their knowledge of human rights. Anything between 1930 and 1951 you did not have any kind of regularly scheduled TV journalism. I am not going to go into detail on how Technology like TV change peoples minds on human rights however if people never seen an African American before but people where told African American's have no feelings then you see a African American cry on TV it changes most peoples mind rather then someone reading it in the paper or listening it on the radio. Even though I agree with you that Older films had racism and the more modern films made after 1975 have no excuse for racism I can give some of the classics some slack for their reasoning for Ignorance.
DeleteAs for The Sword in the Stone I never felt that the sword chose Arthur because he was predestined to have the sword but because of his adventures he had with Merlin giving Arthur a much broad view of the wold compared to the rest of people who tried to pull out the sword.
I a agree with most of what you said Ben, other then the reasoning for racism and the sword in the stone I completely agree with your blog.
Racism and prejudice is hardly new. It would be naive to say that without this device (television) people were so isolated to think that the concept is foreign. We cannot assume all people were worse back then. Perhaps the average tolerance and understanding was skewed towards intolerance. We can judge works by the time they were produced. Every work is a product of its makers and its era. But being part of a time does not excuse its message. If it is racist now it was racist then. Perhaps it was more excusable but it does not negate the message.
ReplyDeleteAs far as Sword in the Stone why I do not agree I find no fault in your argument.